- Move the templates from Miro to here and see if it is a good fit
- Try changing headers to see if the styles can be retained
- Rethink arrows and other visual features
- figjam/design files sync
- populate Figma vs Miro
- figma plugin
Version 1
- Section vs Frames:
- Section pros:
- It is better to demarcate the space
- Doesn’t impact presentation hierarchy
- Better for page numbering etc (i.e., no frame conflict will occur)
- thought: could also just do without components then
- Section cons:
- Doesn’t allow for seamless reshuffling of pages
- Doesn’t have any auto layout features
- Section pros:
- Page number plugin
- Numerator works janky
- Try creating plug-in
- Footer works ideally
- Difficulty making tables
- Autogenerate text/images might be a plus
- Miro -
- https://www.figma.com/community/plugin/814814551050457760/miro
- Could be ideal but ratings suggest it isn’t maintained well
- Arrows solve for now = https://www.figma.com/community/plugin/1296400665621126675/flowify 1. arrows easier to create manually
- Interaction flows
- some components created
- some style variables created
- manually drawn arrows
the effect is a little time consuming but works well
- Component:
- “Component child”
- can inherit all component properties
- can change inherited property without changing parent
- cannot add other things - have to detach for this
- “Component child”